A yob accused of robbing a driving instructor walked free from court - after a judge ruled that the victim was too believable as a witness.
Judge Jamie Tabor praised Denise Dawson as 'honest, utterly decent and brave' when she identified a man as her alleged attacker and gave evidence against him.
But moments later he halted the trial and ordered a not guilty verdict on Liam Perks, 20.
The judge said Mrs Dawson's good character and compelling evidence could sway the jury, even though she had had only a fleeting glimpse of her attacker.
[source]
What a moron! Surely the point of evidence is to sway the jury?
And this is the same judge who...
I appreciate that most of these articles being from the Daily Mail rather weakens the case against anyone, but it was the top Google result. See the main story covered by The Independent, The Times, The Telegraph, or even The Sun. (I also looked on The Guardian's site for a leftest-of-the-left view, but couldn't find an article on it.)
Judge Jamie Tabor -- the sort of person that makes you wonder why being in contempt of court is a crime.
No comments:
Post a Comment