I agree entirely. It got unfairly slated in some places, primarily for being "a little bit like some other films that have been made". So, by that token, 98% of all films made are shite anyway.
Though, Ricky Gervais was crap, and was a lot like every other Ricky Gervais performance ever given.
Which one was Sienna Miller? The girl he was trying to impress?
Meh, she might not be an oscar winner, but it wasn't exactly required for that part. I can't say the performance stood out for me in either a positive or negative way.
Ricky Gervais always plays the same character, but then was only in the film for 4 minutes. And the role was apparently offered first to Vinnie Jones.
De Niro ruled, Mark Williams ruled, all of the ghosts ruled, and the story was good fun.
Not to mention Clare Danes actually got to be in a good film again.
4 comments:
Stardust rocked. And I won't hear otherwise. So there.
I agree entirely. It got unfairly slated in some places, primarily for being "a little bit like some other films that have been made". So, by that token, 98% of all films made are shite anyway.
Though, Ricky Gervais was crap, and was a lot like every other Ricky Gervais performance ever given.
Additionally, Sienna Miller can't act either. But Ricky Gervais stood out more, because he played himself. Again.
Which one was Sienna Miller? The girl he was trying to impress?
Meh, she might not be an oscar winner, but it wasn't exactly required for that part. I can't say the performance stood out for me in either a positive or negative way.
Ricky Gervais always plays the same character, but then was only in the film for 4 minutes. And the role was apparently offered first to Vinnie Jones.
De Niro ruled, Mark Williams ruled, all of the ghosts ruled, and the story was good fun.
Not to mention Clare Danes actually got to be in a good film again.
Post a Comment