Inside EmpireSpecial edition of
Empire celebrating their 20th anniversary. Yes, you're right, they did a 20th Birthday issue earlier this year (guest edited by
Steven Spielberg, no less. I still haven't read it.) This issue focuses in on the magazine itself, however.
That might seem a little self indulgent, but Empire is an internationally respected magazine (c'mon,
Spielberg guest edited it!) Perhaps because they already did a birthday issue, but at times it feels a little slight -- the list of regrettable mistakes (e.g. giving
Attack of the Clones five stars, or
Pearl Harbor four), for example, only manages 20 entries, which after some 246 issues seems unlikelily brief.
Other features fail to live up to their promise:
What Might Have Been... doesn't present as well-realised an alternate history of the last 20 years in movies as you'd've hoped, for instance, while the focus on the 'directors who define Empire' are just old quotes (though some at least are interesting), and the profile of the readership is as silly as you'd hope but at just two pages feels lacklustre. Several articles merely relive former glories in a watered-down version, such as the six pages dedicated to the
Lord of the Rings photo supplement they did in 2003.
It's not all bad -- some of the features are worth a read, like the editors' reminisces or the summary of the Real World in the last 20 years (not as thorough as could be, but wins points for noting
Doctor Who was 2005's most defining TV series and
GoldenEye 1997's most defining game. Some of the album choices are thoroughly suspect though -- if I've not even heard of them, how defining can they really be?)
Perhaps the 20th birthday issue was a more worthy celebration. I really ought to read that...
